v8.50.0 — Multi-LLM /octo:review
Rebuild /octo:review as a direct multi-LLM competitor to Claude Code's managed Code Review service.
New: 3-Round Review Pipeline
Round 1 — Parallel Specialist Fleet
- 🔴 Codex — logic/correctness bugs, edge cases, regressions
- 🟡 Gemini — OWASP, injection, auth flaws, data exposure
- 🔵 Claude — architecture, API contracts, breaking changes
- 🟣 Perplexity — live CVE/advisory lookup (→ Gemini → Claude WebSearch fallback)
Round 2 — Verification
- Codex verifier checks each finding against actual code behavior
- Filters false positives; adversarial debate on contested findings
Round 3 — Synthesis
- Claude deduplicates, severity-ranks, formats output
Features
- Inline PR comments — posts 🔴 Normal / 🟡 Nit / 🟣 Pre-existing findings to open PRs via
gh api - REVIEW.md support — drop-in compatible with CC Code Review's
REVIEW.mdconvention - Typed review profile —
target,focus[],provenance,autonomy,publish,debate - Provider cascade — Perplexity → Gemini → Claude WebSearch (graceful degradation)
- Autonomous mode — infers target from git state; no Q&A required
- Structured output —
~/.claude-octopus/results/review-findings-<timestamp>.json
How /octo:review beats CC Code Review
| Feature | CC Code Review | /octo:review |
|---|---|---|
| Providers | Claude only | Codex + Gemini + Claude + Perplexity |
| CVE lookup | Codebase-only | Live web search |
| Works pre-PR | No | Yes |
| Verified findings | No | Adversarial debate gate |
| Structured output | No | findings.json |
| REVIEW.md | Yes | Yes (drop-in) |
Files changed
scripts/orchestrate.sh—review_run(),build_review_fleet(),parse_review_md(),post_inline_comments(), synthesis/render helpers.claude/commands/review.md— clean redesign with autonomous context acquisitionmcp-server/src/index.ts+openclaw/src/index.ts— 6-field typed profiletests/unit/test-review-run.sh— 17 static analysis tests